Home of N2D.

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

20-8-2016 8:59 pm  #1

Update on closing statements

It is no secret that magistrates courts do not work the same in all areas. So long as certain legal procedures are observed, the mags can run their courts as they see fit. One aspect of this is that in some courts the Clerks seem to display more power than others. An over officious clerk will frequently interrupt you and can disrupt your case. This often happens with our members. Other than appealing to the bench to be allowed to present your case in full, there is little you can do. But if you do complain to the bench, do so with caution and respect or you may be in contempt.

In one recent case we followed this up by way of complaint. The reply was disturbing. With regard to the closing statement the person was stopped by the clerk. The reply stated that the closing statement was for summing up of the evidence disclosed in court (under cross-examination) and nothing further could be added to the summary.

I am not a legal professional but have several years experience of attending court mainly in licensing matters. This reply totally flies in the face of my experience. There have been cases where I have chosen not to cross examine the witness(es) but have still been allowed (expected even) to make a closing statement.

In view of this I would suggest anyone with a case coming up proceeds with caution regarding their closing statement. I would suggest anything you intend to put in your summary should if possible be discussed under cross examination or at least be referred to in some way.

Please ensure you do not divulge any information which could identify you as Border Force will use your posts here as evidence against you in court.


Board footera


Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum

Disclaimer:- This forum is an open forum, and anyone can post their thoughts here (within reason). Therefore the views expressed here are those of individuals and not necessarily those of Nothing 2 Declare. We try to allow as much freedom of speech as possible, including views that some may find objectionable. This includes the views of UKBA, Border Force, HMRC, legitimate cross-border shoppers, non-legitimate importers, general public and anyone else that wishes to post.
Regarding ourselves, we categorically do not condone smuggling and neither do we condone the current tactics used against legitimate cross-border shoppers by UKBA/Border Force and HMRC. The current tactics benefit both Customs and smugglers alike.
Although some people use real names, there is no guarantee that they are who they say they are; it is impossible for us to verify identities of all members.